WORLD: LEBANON ON THE PRECIPICE

The Israeli invasion of Lebanon has begun — and there are reports of heavy fighting between units of the Israel Defense Forces and Hezbollah in south Lebanon, accompanied by airstrikes and shelling of Hezbollah positions.
For the past year, many have feared that the war between Israel and Hamas will spill over into neighbouring countries and drag the Middle East into a devastating conflict. Now, Israel has launched what it is calling a “limited ground operation”, which it claims is designed to clear Hezbollah out of south Lebanon.
In mid-September, Israel announced it was shifting its defence policy towards its northern border, where 70,000 people had been displaced over the past year by rockets fired by Hezbollah. Defence minister Yoav Gallant said its war aims had shifted to include ensuring these civilians could return to their homes in safety.
After a fortnight of missile strikes into Lebanon, Israel claims to have eliminated much of the Hezbollah leadership as well as knocking out a great deal of its military infrastructure. This next phase of the conflict will pose more intense challenges for all involved and presents great risks to the region and beyond.
But perhaps lost in the debates about whether Israel can defeat Hezbollah (and Hamas in Gaza), how Iran (Hezbollah and Hamas’ main backer) will respond and who will ultimately win, is the possibility that Lebanon could fail as a state if this war escalates. And that serves no one’s interests.
Lebanon is a vulnerable country that has been plagued by devastating economic and political crises, corruption, human rights violations and a breakdown in trust between the government and society over the past decade. Its economy is fragile, having never recovered from the global financial crisis of 2008-2009. The Covid-19 pandemic hammered the Lebanese economy when it was still reeling from the collapse of its financial system in 2019 and the default on its unbearably high levels of debt in 2020.
Global inflationary and cost of living pressures have further undermined the ability of ordinary Lebanese to provide for themselves and their families. The country has haemorrhaged capital in recent years and very few foreign investors have the stomach to risk their money there. Per capita incomes have declined substantially and remain very low, at around $3,300 — down from around $9,000 in 2018.
Lebanon’s economy has gone into reverse since the crisis in 2019, with gross domestic product declining from $59 billion in 2018 to just $22 billion today. Coupled with a 95 percent depreciation of the Lebanese pound and inflation that has hit 200 percent, nearly half the population is now below the poverty line.
There has been a breakdown in waste disposal and electricity supplies (Lebanon’s state power company struggles to supply even two hours of electricity per day). Reserves of foreign currencies are exceptionally low and Lebanon runs a trade deficit that hovers around $9 billion annually. This has further strained the ability of ordinary Lebanese to access the goods and services they need to survive (let alone thrive).
War in prospect
Even short wars tend to have devastating economic effects that last long after the fighting ends. If history tells us anything about the current conflict, we can expect a prolonged and intense fight between Israel and Hezbollah. This war could very easily destroy the Lebanese economy, bringing the entire country to the point of collapse.
It would not be the first time this has happened. There are parallels with the turbulent early 1970s and the outbreak of the 1975-1990 Lebanese civil war. The influx of approximately 1.5 million Syrian refugees since the onset of the civil war there in 2011, has placed unbearable pressures on the provision of goods and services in Lebanon. The demand for healthcare, education, utilities and housing has far exceeded supply.
The international community has helped Lebanon host Syrian refugees with a number of initiatives, including the 2016 EU-Lebanon Compact, a plan to send financial aid amounting to several billion dollars. Yet the financial and material support provided has been insufficient. Lebanon has creaked and strained under the pressures of having the highest refugee-to-citizen ratio in the world.
A failed state?
If economic turmoil and hardship were not bad enough, the Lebanese political landscape remains amongst the most fractured and contentious in the region. In many ways, Lebanon has not had a fully functioning set of state institutions for much of the past five years. Intense political rivalries and divisions between political parties has meant that the government cannot fully function.
And now the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah means that millions of ordinary people face serious threats to their lives and livelihoods, with little the government can do to help them.
Up to a million civilians in Lebanon have been displaced and much infrastructure and property has been destroyed across the country. And that was before the ground invasion began.
But there’s little doubt that Israel intends to permanently shift the balance of power by ensuring Hezbollah is no longer a viable military threat.
There are clear parallels with Israel’s 2006 invasion of Lebanon (the 34-day war) and the much broader 1982 invasion. The 2006 conflict devastated Lebanon’s infrastructure, while the 1982 invasion lasted until 2000, leading to immense destruction, hardship, insecurity and instability.
The current conflict could destabilise Lebanon to such an extent that there is even potential for a second civil war. This would serve no one’s interest. An unstable, devastated and failing Lebanon will only have negative ramifications for all in the Middle East, including Israel.
If the Hobbesian logic of the strong doing what they will, and the weak suffering what they must, is allowed to continue, only collapse and ruin will follow in Lebanon, the Middle East and further afield. It is imperative that sense and reason prevail and the war between Israel, Hamas and Hezbollah de-escalates.
The writer is associate professor in International Relations at Nottingham
Trent University in the UK
Republished from The Conversation
Published in Dawn, EOS, October 6th, 2024